linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Return error from swiotlb_init_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 2 Feb 2019 18:06:08 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Return error from swiotlb_init_with_tbl()

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 05:59:01PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > This sounds like a change to break quite a couple of places in the
> > > kernel. But okay, it just makes this hunk obsolete.
> > 
> > He also added either explicit panic calls or error handling (panic
> > in case of swiotlb):
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10766115/
> 
> I see, are these patches queued somewhere? My patch needs to be based on
> his changes.

I think akpm queued them up in -mm.  At least I got some mails claiming
patches from the series have been applied.