[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1549201508.260461916@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:45:08 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Pan Bian" <bianpan2016@....com>, "Qu Wenruo" <wqu@...e.com>,
"David Sterba" <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 224/305] btrfs: relocation: set trans to be NULL
after ending transaction
3.16.63-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
commit 42a657f57628402c73237547f0134e083e2f6764 upstream.
The function relocate_block_group calls btrfs_end_transaction to release
trans when update_backref_cache returns 1, and then continues the loop
body. If btrfs_block_rsv_refill fails this time, it will jump out the
loop and the freed trans will be accessed. This may result in a
use-after-free bug. The patch assigns NULL to trans after trans is
released so that it will not be accessed.
Fixes: 0647bf564f1 ("Btrfs: improve forever loop when doing balance relocation")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -3955,6 +3955,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack int relocate_b
restart:
if (update_backref_cache(trans, &rc->backref_cache)) {
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, rc->extent_root);
+ trans = NULL;
continue;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists