lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1549201508.565110085@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:45:08 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        "Erik Schmauss" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "Jean-Marc Lenoir" <archlinux@...emel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 101/305] ACPICA: AML interpreter: add region
 addresses in global list during initialization

3.16.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>

commit 4abb951b73ff0a8a979113ef185651aa3c8da19b upstream.

The table load process omitted adding the operation region address
range to the global list. This omission is problematic because the OS
queries the global list to check for address range conflicts before
deciding which drivers to load. This commit may result in warning
messages that look like the following:

[    7.871761] ACPI Warning: system_IO range 0x00000428-0x0000042F conflicts with op_region 0x00000400-0x0000047F (\PMIO) (20180531/utaddress-213)
[    7.871769] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver

However, these messages do not signify regressions. It is a result of
properly adding address ranges within the global address list.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200011
Tested-by: Jean-Marc Lenoir <archlinux@...emel.com>
Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/dsopcode.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsopcode.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsopcode.c
@@ -449,6 +449,10 @@ acpi_ds_eval_region_operands(struct acpi
 			  ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(obj_desc->region.address),
 			  obj_desc->region.length));
 
+	status = acpi_ut_add_address_range(obj_desc->region.space_id,
+					   obj_desc->region.address,
+					   obj_desc->region.length, node);
+
 	/* Now the address and length are valid for this opregion */
 
 	obj_desc->region.flags |= AOPOBJ_DATA_VALID;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ