[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190204220952.30761-1-TheSven73@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:09:49 -0500
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [RFC v1 0/3] Address potential user-after-free on module unload
I think there _might_ be potential use-after-free issues on module unload.
They are hard to trigger, but I think I've seen them bring the whole
kernel down when they do occur. Can be triggered by doing an insmod of
a vulnerable module, rapidly followed by an rmmod.
Caused by drivers which schedule work / delayed_work, but do not clean it up
properly on module unload. Which means the work function could run _after_
the module has unloaded.
A quick grep through the kernel sources brings up many instances.
I leave it to people more knowledgeable than me to determine if this problem
is likely to happen, and/or if it can be exploited to become a security risk.
Perhaps developers can be 'nudged' into doing the right thing by using
resource-managed versions of INIT_WORK() / INIT_DELAYED_WORK(), which may
address the issue quite elegantly.
Attached is a proposal patch, followed by sample fixes for two vulnerable
modules. As far as I can tell, many more modules are vulnerable.
Sven Van Asbroeck (3):
workqueue: Add resource-managed version of INIT_[DELAYED_]WORK()
max17042_battery: fix potential user-after-free on module unload
cap11xx: fix potential user-after-free on module unload
drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c | 6 ++-
drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c | 5 ++-
include/linux/workqueue.h | 7 ++++
kernel/workqueue.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists