linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] kvm: Add guest side support for free memory hints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:00:18 -0800
From:   Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] kvm: Add guest side support for free memory hints

> On Feb 4, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Add guest support for providing free memory hints to the KVM hypervisor for
> freed pages huge TLB size or larger. I am restricting the size to
> huge TLB order and larger because the hypercalls are too expensive to be
> performing one per 4K page. Using the huge TLB order became the obvious
> choice for the order to use as it allows us to avoid fragmentation of higher
> order memory on the host.
> 
> I have limited the functionality so that it doesn't work when page
> poisoning is enabled. I did this because a write to the page after doing an
> MADV_DONTNEED would effectively negate the hint, so it would be wasting
> cycles to do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/page.h |   13 +++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c       |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> index 7555b48803a8..4487ad7a3385 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
> 
> struct page;
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GUEST
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +extern struct static_key_false pv_free_page_hint_enabled;
> +
> +#define HAVE_ARCH_FREE_PAGE
> +void __arch_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
> +static inline void arch_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> +{
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&pv_free_page_hint_enabled))
> +		__arch_free_page(page, order);
> +}
> +#endif

This patch and the following one assume that only KVM should be able to hook
to these events. I do not think it is appropriate for __arch_free_page() to
effectively mean “kvm_guest_free_page()”.

Is it possible to use the paravirt infrastructure for this feature,
similarly to other PV features? It is not the best infrastructure, but at least
it is hypervisor-neutral.