[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190204234047.GA15685@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 01:40:47 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, jgg@...pe.ca
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm/st33zp24: Fix the name collisions in
tpm_st33zp24_spi and tpm_i2c_infineon
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:31:17AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:49:54PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > On 2/4/2019 2:37 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Rename TPM_BUFSIZE defined in drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.h to
> > > ST33ZP24_BUFSIZE.
> > >
> > > Rename TPM_BUFSIZE defined in drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c to
> > > TPM_I2C_INFINEON_BUFSIZE.
> >
> > Please also add a prefix to TPM_RETRY in tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c.
>
> Thanks, can do.
TPM_RETRY defined in
32d33b29ba07 ("TPM: Retry SaveState command in suspend path")
has nothing to do with time. I'll also remove the comment about 5
seconds.
The definitions for TPM_RETRY seem fairly arbitrary. Jason, could
tpm_i2c_nuvoton also use the same constant as tpm_tis_spi and TPM 1.2
suspend, try max 50 times instead of five?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists