| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190204103622.738094747@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:36:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 17/80] vhost: fix OOB in get_rx_bufs()
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit b46a0bf78ad7b150ef5910da83859f7f5a514ffd ]
After batched used ring updating was introduced in commit e2b3b35eb989
("vhost_net: batch used ring update in rx"). We tend to batch heads in
vq->heads for more than one packet. But the quota passed to
get_rx_bufs() was not correctly limited, which can result a OOB write
in vq->heads.
headcount = get_rx_bufs(vq, vq->heads + nvq->done_idx,
vhost_len, &in, vq_log, &log,
likely(mergeable) ? UIO_MAXIOV : 1);
UIO_MAXIOV was still used which is wrong since we could have batched
used in vq->heads, this will cause OOB if the next buffer needs more
than 960 (1024 (UIO_MAXIOV) - 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH)) heads after we've
batched 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) heads:
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
=============================================================================
BUG kmalloc-8k (Tainted: G B ): Redzone overwritten
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO: 0x00000000fd93b7a2-0x00000000f0713384. First byte 0xa9 instead of 0xcc
INFO: Allocated in alloc_pd+0x22/0x60 age=3933677 cpu=2 pid=2674
kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xbb/0x140
alloc_pd+0x22/0x60
gen8_ppgtt_create+0x11d/0x5f0
i915_ppgtt_create+0x16/0x80
i915_gem_create_context+0x248/0x390
i915_gem_context_create_ioctl+0x4b/0xe0
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0xf0
drm_ioctl+0x2ed/0x3a0
do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f/0x620
ksys_ioctl+0x6b/0x80
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
INFO: Slab 0x00000000d13e87af objects=3 used=3 fp=0x (null) flags=0x200000000010201
INFO: Object 0x0000000003278802 @offset=17064 fp=0x00000000e2e6652b
Fixing this by allocating UIO_MAXIOV + VHOST_NET_BATCH iovs for
vhost-net. This is done through set the limitation through
vhost_dev_init(), then set_owner can allocate the number of iov in a
per device manner.
This fixes CVE-2018-16880.
Fixes: e2b3b35eb989 ("vhost_net: batch used ring update in rx")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 3 ++-
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 2 +-
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 +++-
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -1293,7 +1293,8 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *
n->vqs[i].rx_ring = NULL;
vhost_net_buf_init(&n->vqs[i].rxq);
}
- vhost_dev_init(dev, vqs, VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX);
+ vhost_dev_init(dev, vqs, VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX,
+ UIO_MAXIOV + VHOST_NET_BATCH);
vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, EPOLLOUT, dev);
vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, EPOLLIN, dev);
--- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
@@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_open(struct inode
vqs[i] = &vs->vqs[i].vq;
vs->vqs[i].vq.handle_kick = vhost_scsi_handle_kick;
}
- vhost_dev_init(&vs->dev, vqs, VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ);
+ vhost_dev_init(&vs->dev, vqs, VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ, UIO_MAXIOV);
vhost_scsi_init_inflight(vs, NULL);
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -390,9 +390,9 @@ static long vhost_dev_alloc_iovecs(struc
vq->indirect = kmalloc_array(UIO_MAXIOV,
sizeof(*vq->indirect),
GFP_KERNEL);
- vq->log = kmalloc_array(UIO_MAXIOV, sizeof(*vq->log),
+ vq->log = kmalloc_array(dev->iov_limit, sizeof(*vq->log),
GFP_KERNEL);
- vq->heads = kmalloc_array(UIO_MAXIOV, sizeof(*vq->heads),
+ vq->heads = kmalloc_array(dev->iov_limit, sizeof(*vq->heads),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vq->indirect || !vq->log || !vq->heads)
goto err_nomem;
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void vhost_dev_free_iovecs(struct
}
void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
- struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs)
+ struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs, int iov_limit)
{
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
int i;
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *de
dev->iotlb = NULL;
dev->mm = NULL;
dev->worker = NULL;
+ dev->iov_limit = iov_limit;
init_llist_head(&dev->work_list);
init_waitqueue_head(&dev->wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->read_list);
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
@@ -170,9 +170,11 @@ struct vhost_dev {
struct list_head read_list;
struct list_head pending_list;
wait_queue_head_t wait;
+ int iov_limit;
};
-void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs);
+void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs,
+ int nvqs, int iov_limit);
long vhost_dev_set_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev);
bool vhost_dev_has_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev);
long vhost_dev_check_owner(struct vhost_dev *);
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_open(struct i
vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX].handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick;
vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX].handle_kick = vhost_vsock_handle_rx_kick;
- vhost_dev_init(&vsock->dev, vqs, ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs));
+ vhost_dev_init(&vsock->dev, vqs, ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs), UIO_MAXIOV);
file->private_data = vsock;
spin_lock_init(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists