[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190204103613.928121972@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:37:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 30/46] gpio: pcf857x: Fix interrupts on multiple instances
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
commit 2486e67374aa8b7854c2de32869642c2873b3d53 upstream.
When multiple instances of pcf857x chips are present, a fix up
message [1] is printed during the probe of the 2nd and later
instances.
The issue is that the driver is using the same irq_chip data
structure between multiple instances.
Fix this by allocating the irq_chip data structure per instance.
[1] fix up message addressed by this patch
[ 1.212100] gpio gpiochip9: (pcf8575): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
Cc: Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pcf857x_of_table
*/
struct pcf857x {
struct gpio_chip chip;
+ struct irq_chip irqchip;
struct i2c_client *client;
struct mutex lock; /* protect 'out' */
unsigned out; /* software latch */
@@ -252,18 +253,6 @@ static void pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(
mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);
}
-static struct irq_chip pcf857x_irq_chip = {
- .name = "pcf857x",
- .irq_enable = pcf857x_irq_enable,
- .irq_disable = pcf857x_irq_disable,
- .irq_ack = noop,
- .irq_mask = noop,
- .irq_unmask = noop,
- .irq_set_wake = pcf857x_irq_set_wake,
- .irq_bus_lock = pcf857x_irq_bus_lock,
- .irq_bus_sync_unlock = pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
-};
-
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
@@ -376,8 +365,17 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_clie
/* Enable irqchip if we have an interrupt */
if (client->irq) {
+ gpio->irqchip.name = "pcf857x",
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_enable = pcf857x_irq_enable,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_disable = pcf857x_irq_disable,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_ack = noop,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_mask = noop,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_unmask = noop,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_set_wake = pcf857x_irq_set_wake,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_bus_lock = pcf857x_irq_bus_lock,
+ gpio->irqchip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
status = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&gpio->chip,
- &pcf857x_irq_chip,
+ &gpio->irqchip,
0, handle_level_irq,
IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
if (status) {
@@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_clie
if (status)
goto fail;
- gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->chip, &pcf857x_irq_chip,
+ gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->chip, &gpio->irqchip,
client->irq);
gpio->irq_parent = client->irq;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists