[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190204145736.GL31132@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 06:57:36 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] block: sed-opal: pass steps via argument rather
than via opal_dev
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:50:21PM +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> The steps argument is only read by the next function, so it can
> be passed directly as an argument rather than via opal_dev.
>
> Normally, the steps is an array on the stack, so the pointer stops
> being valid then the function that set opal_dev.steps returns.
> If opal_dev.steps was not set to NULL before return it would become
> a dangling pointer. When the steps are passed as argument this
> becomes easier to see and more difficult to misuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists