lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190204161346.GC31598@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:13:46 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/5] perf/x86/kvm: Avoid unnecessary work in guest
 filtering

> As my understanding, the microcode version for each stepping is independent
> and irrelevant. The 0x0000004e should be just coincidence.
> If so, I don't think X86_STEPPING_ANY is very useful.
> 
> Andi, if I'm wrong please correct me.

Yes that's right. You cannot match microcode without stepping.

-Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ