linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/omap: panel-tpo-td028ttec1: add backlight support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9eb955aa-3a87-7f25-21ce-c177b67de522@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:13:46 +0200
From:   Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
CC:     <airlied@...ux.ie>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, <sre@...nel.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/omap: panel-tpo-td028ttec1: add backlight support

Hi,

On 19/01/2019 20:21, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> This panel has a backlight, so fetch it from devicetree using the
> as documented in panel-common.txt. It is implemented the same way as in

Extra words above, or maybe some are missing...

> panel-dpi.c
> This ensures the backlight is also disabled when the display is
> turned off like when doing xset dpms force off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c    | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> index 7ddc8c574a61..f326ba9dcf62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ struct panel_drv_data {
>  
>  	struct videomode vm;
>  
> +	struct backlight_device *backlight;
> +
>  	struct spi_device *spi_dev;
>  };
>  
> @@ -268,6 +270,8 @@ static int td028ttec1_panel_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
>  
>  	r |= jbt_ret_write_0(ddata, JBT_REG_DISPLAY_ON);
>  
> +	backlight_enable(ddata->backlight);
> +
>  	dssdev->state = OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_ACTIVE;
>  
>  transfer_err:
> @@ -283,6 +287,8 @@ static void td028ttec1_panel_disable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
>  	if (!omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
>  		return;
>  
> +	backlight_disable(ddata->backlight);
> +
>  	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "td028ttec1_panel_disable()\n");
>  
>  	jbt_ret_write_0(ddata, JBT_REG_DISPLAY_OFF);
> @@ -321,6 +327,15 @@ static int td028ttec1_panel_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  
>  	dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>  
> +	ddata = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (ddata == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ddata->backlight = devm_of_find_backlight(&spi->dev);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(ddata->backlight))
> +		return PTR_ERR(ddata->backlight);
> +

Is there a reason for moving the ddata alloc here, instead of keeping it
where it was?

>  	spi->bits_per_word = 9;
>  	spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
>  
> @@ -330,9 +345,6 @@ static int td028ttec1_panel_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  		return r;
>  	}
>  
> -	ddata = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (ddata == NULL)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
>  

This leaves an extra empty line here.

>  	dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, ddata);
>  

 Tomi

-- 
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki