lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190204082307.GA5916@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:23:07 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        vdumpa@...dia.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-direct: do not allocate a single page from CMA
 area

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:51:40PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The addresses within a single page are always contiguous, so it's
> not so necessary to allocate one single page from CMA area. Since
> the CMA area has a limited predefined size of space, it might run
> out of space in some heavy use case, where there might be quite a
> lot CMA pages being allocated for single pages.
> 
> This patch tries to skip CMA allocations of single pages and lets
> them go through normal page allocations unless the allocation has
> a DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS attribute. This'd save some resources
> in the CMA area for further more CMA allocations, and it can also
> reduce CMA fragmentations resulted from trivial allocations.

That DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS flag does not make sense.  A single
page allocation is per defintion always contigous.

>  again:
> -	/* CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping */
> -	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
> +	/*
> +	 * CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping.
> +	 * Since addresses within one PAGE are always contiguous, skip
> +	 * CMA allocation for a single page to save CMA reserved space
> +	 * unless DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS is flagged.
> +	 */
> +	if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) &&
> +	    (count > 1 || attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS)) {

And my other concern is that this skips allocating from the per-device
pool, which drivers might rely on.  To be honest I'm not sure there is
much of a point in the per-device CMA pool vs the traditional per-device
coherent pool, but I'd rather change that behavior in a clearly documented
commit with intentions rather as a side effect from a random optimization.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ