linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mailbox: bcm-flexrm-mailbox: Fix FlexRM ring flush timeout issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc8e7d9b-51fb-d216-d85c-915dda7d18ae@broadcom.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:22:57 -0800
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: bcm-flexrm-mailbox: Fix FlexRM ring flush
 timeout issue

Fix looks good.

On 2019-02-04 11:21 a.m., Ray Jui wrote:
> From: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
>
> RING_CONTROL reg was not written due to wrong address, hence all
> the subsequent ring flush was timing out.
>
> Fixes: a371c10ea4b3 ("mailbox: bcm-flexrm-mailbox: Fix FlexRM ring flush sequence")
>
> Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c
> index d713271ebf7c..a64116586b4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c
> @@ -1396,9 +1396,9 @@ static void flexrm_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>   
>   	/* Clear ring flush state */
>   	timeout = 1000; /* timeout of 1s */
> -	writel_relaxed(0x0, ring + RING_CONTROL);
> +	writel_relaxed(0x0, ring->regs + RING_CONTROL);
>   	do {
> -		if (!(readl_relaxed(ring + RING_FLUSH_DONE) &
> +		if (!(readl_relaxed(ring->regs + RING_FLUSH_DONE) &
>   		      FLUSH_DONE_MASK))
>   			break;
>   		mdelay(1);