[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6a9e68d-ff0a-c33d-50ce-5d18939c1ab3@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 09:08:33 +0100
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm/st33zp24: Fix the name collisions in
tpm_st33zp24_spi and tpm_i2c_infineon
On 2/5/2019 12:40 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:31:17AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:49:54PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2019 2:37 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>>> Rename TPM_BUFSIZE defined in drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.h to
>>>> ST33ZP24_BUFSIZE.
>>>>
>>>> Rename TPM_BUFSIZE defined in drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c to
>>>> TPM_I2C_INFINEON_BUFSIZE.
>>>
>>> Please also add a prefix to TPM_RETRY in tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c.
>>
>> Thanks, can do.
>
> TPM_RETRY defined in
>
> 32d33b29ba07 ("TPM: Retry SaveState command in suspend path")
>
> has nothing to do with time. I'll also remove the comment about 5
> seconds.
I'll do the same for patch 4/6.
Roberto
> The definitions for TPM_RETRY seem fairly arbitrary. Jason, could
> tpm_i2c_nuvoton also use the same constant as tpm_tis_spi and TPM 1.2
> suspend, try max 50 times instead of five?
>
> /Jarkko
>
--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI
Powered by blists - more mailing lists