| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b190a7f0-eec9-3e87-f9c7-4969e05590df@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:22:50 +0530
From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] Revert
"scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device"
Hi Bjorn,
On 05/02/19 11:57 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 04 Feb 20:58 PST 2019, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 04/02/19 11:12 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 60f0187031c05e04cbadffb62f557d0ff3564490.
>>>
>>> Calling ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused hangs my system.
>>> It seems vccq is not *not* needed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
>>> ---
>>
>> AFAIK Samsung and Toshiba UFS devices does not use VCCQ (this pin is
>> either floating or connected to Ground, at least on the devices that I
>> have worked on).
>
> But why does such system define a vccq-supply? If the system doesn't
> have a regulator connected to VCCQ, then the UFS driver shouldn't be
> told that there is one. And if VCCQ is optional the UFS driver should
> support the fact that this regulator might not be supplied (i.e. call
> regulator_get_optional() and handle the error indicating that the supply
> isn't specified).
>
As per JESD220C, chapter 6.1, it does says "VCCQ - Supply voltage used
typically for the memory controller and optionally for the PHY
interface, the memory IO, and any other internal very low voltage block"
And we have VCCQ2 - which serve the pretty much same purpose. The
voltage range for VCCQ and VCCQ2 are different, VCCQ has a lower voltage
suitable to some low voltage block inside UFS device. I think this is
design consideration which allow some vendor to use one less physical
pin may be. And also depends on the voltage requirements of some of the
internal circuit.
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> You said your system hanged, I believe you have set UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ
>> quirks, in that case VCCQ regulator should having been disabled.
>> So you mean your system hanged because vccq regulator got disabled?
>>
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 -
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 59 +++------------------------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>>> index dd65fea07687..7da7318eb6a6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>>> @@ -514,7 +514,6 @@ struct ufs_vreg {
>>> struct regulator *reg;
>>> const char *name;
>>> bool enabled;
>>> - bool unused;
>>> int min_uV;
>>> int max_uV;
>>> int min_uA;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>>> index 9ba7671b84f8..8b9a01073d62 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>>> @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>> static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on,
>>> bool skip_ref_clk);
>>> static int ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on);
>>> -static int ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool unused);
>>> static int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>> static int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_enter(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>> static inline void ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>> @@ -6819,11 +6818,6 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>> ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba, &card);
>>> ufshcd_tune_unipro_params(hba);
>>>
>>> - ret = ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(hba,
>>> - (hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ) ? true : false);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - goto out;
>>> -
>>> /* UFS device is also active now */
>>> ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active(hba);
>>> ufshcd_force_reset_auto_bkops(hba);
>>> @@ -7007,24 +7001,13 @@ static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg,
>>> static inline int ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>> struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>> {
>>> - if (!vreg)
>>> - return 0;
>>> - else if (vreg->unused)
>>> - return 0;
>>> - else
>>> - return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg,
>>> - UFS_VREG_LPM_LOAD_UA);
>>> + return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, UFS_VREG_LPM_LOAD_UA);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static inline int ufshcd_config_vreg_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>> struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>> {
>>> - if (!vreg)
>>> - return 0;
>>> - else if (vreg->unused)
>>> - return 0;
>>> - else
>>> - return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, vreg->max_uA);
>>> + return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, vreg->max_uA);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int ufshcd_config_vreg(struct device *dev,
>>> @@ -7062,9 +7045,7 @@ static int ufshcd_enable_vreg(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>> {
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> - if (!vreg)
>>> - goto out;
>>> - else if (vreg->enabled || vreg->unused)
>>> + if (!vreg || vreg->enabled)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> ret = ufshcd_config_vreg(dev, vreg, true);
>>> @@ -7084,9 +7065,7 @@ static int ufshcd_disable_vreg(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>> {
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> - if (!vreg)
>>> - goto out;
>>> - else if (!vreg->enabled || vreg->unused)
>>> + if (!vreg || !vreg->enabled)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> ret = regulator_disable(vreg->reg);
>>> @@ -7192,36 +7171,6 @@ static int ufshcd_init_hba_vreg(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool unused)
>>> -{
>>> - int ret = 0;
>>> - struct ufs_vreg_info *info = &hba->vreg_info;
>>> -
>>> - if (!info)
>>> - goto out;
>>> - else if (!info->vccq)
>>> - goto out;
>>> -
>>> - if (unused) {
>>> - /* shut off the rail here */
>>> - ret = ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, info->vccq, false);
>>> - /*
>>> - * Mark this rail as no longer used, so it doesn't get enabled
>>> - * later by mistake
>>> - */
>>> - if (!ret)
>>> - info->vccq->unused = true;
>>> - } else {
>>> - /*
>>> - * rail should have been already enabled hence just make sure
>>> - * that unused flag is cleared.
>>> - */
>>> - info->vccq->unused = false;
>>> - }
>>> -out:
>>> - return ret;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on,
>>> bool skip_ref_clk)
>>> {
>>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists