[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4BA2980@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:57:00 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] sched refcount_t conversions
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 02:27:25PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > Elena Reshetova (5):
> > sched: convert sighand_struct.count to refcount_t
> > sched: convert signal_struct.sigcnt to refcount_t
>
> These should really be seen by Oleg (bounced) and I'll await his reply.
>
> > sched: convert numa_group.refcount to refcount_t
> > sched/task_struct: convert task_struct.usage to refcount_t
> > sched/task_struct: convert task_struct.stack_refcount to refcount_t
>
> Those are ok and I'll queue them.
Just to double check that nothing got lost in between:
I noticed that above task_struct patches got merged, is numa_group one also
coming soon?
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists