[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3784fe11-bdc4-5751-13b4-f50bdeeee205@i2se.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:14:36 +0100
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Eben Upton <eben@...pberrypi.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: bcm2835: Clear current buffer pointers and counts
after a transfer
Am 05.02.19 um 13:09 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:42:25PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
>> The driver's interrupt handler checks whether a message is currently
>> being handled with the curr_msg pointer. When it is NULL, the interrupt
>> is considered to be unexpected. Similarly, the i2c_start_transfer
>> routine checks for the remaining number of messages to handle in
>> num_msgs.
>>
>> However, these values are never cleared and always keep the message and
>> number relevant to the latest transfer (which might be done already and
>> the underlying message memory might have been freed).
>>
>> When an unexpected interrupt hits with the DONE bit set, the isr will
>> then try to access the flags field of the curr_msg structure, leading
>> to a fatal page fault.
>>
>> The msg_buf and msg_buf_remaining fields are also never cleared at the
>> end of the transfer, which can lead to similar pitfalls.
>>
>> Fix these issues by introducing a cleanup function and always calling
>> it after a transfer is finished.
>>
>> Fixes: e2474541032d ("i2c: bcm2835: Fix hang for writing messages larger than 16 bytes")
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> Stefan, Florian, any comment about this patch?
Acked-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists