linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/65] 4.4.173-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190205144221.GB17950@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:42:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/65] 4.4.173-stable review

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:48:17PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:35:53AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.173 release.
> > There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb  6 10:35:30 UTC 2019.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 171 pass: 171 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 291 pass: 291 fail: 0 (*)
> 
> Guenter
> 
> ---
> (*) I had to revert to gcc 5.3.0 for sh4 boot tests.
>     With gcc 8.2.0, most tests stall early in boot.
>     I didn't try to track down the root cause.

Is this a new issue?  I don't see any sh-specific patches in this
series.

thnaks,

greg k-h