linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] exec: don't force_sigsegv processes with a pending fatal signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190205025308.GA24455@visor>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 18:53:08 -0800
From:   Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] exec: don't force_sigsegv processes with a pending fatal
 signal

We were seeing unexplained segfaults in coreutils processes and other
basic utilities on systems with print-fatal-signals enabled:

	[  311.001986] potentially unexpected fatal signal 11.
	[  311.001993] CPU: 3 PID: 4565 Comm: tail Tainted: P           O    4.9.100.Ar-8497547.eostrunkkernel49 #1
	[  311.001995] task: ffff88021431b400 task.stack: ffffc90004cec000
	[  311.001997] RIP: 0023:[<00000000f7722c09>]  [<00000000f7722c09>] 0xf7722c09
	[  311.002003] RSP: 002b:00000000ffcc8aa4  EFLAGS: 00000296
	[  311.002004] RAX: fffffffffffffff2 RBX: 0000000057efc530 RCX: 0000000057efdb68
	[  311.002006] RDX: 0000000057effb60 RSI: 0000000057efdb68 RDI: 00000000f768f000
	[  311.002007] RBP: 0000000057efc530 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
	[  311.002008] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
	[  311.002009] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
	[  311.002011] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88021e980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
	[  311.002013] CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
	[  311.002014] CR2: 00000000f77bf097 CR3: 0000000150f6f000 CR4: 00000000000406f0

We tracked these crashes down to binfmt_elf failing to load segments
for ld.so inside the kernel. Digging further, the actual problem
seems to occur when a process gets sigkilled while it is still being
loaded by the kernel. In our case when _do_page_fault goes for a retry
it will return early as it first checks for fatal_signal_pending(), so
load_elf_interp also returns with error and as a result
search_binary_handler will force_sigsegv() which is pretty confusing as
nothing actually failed here.


v2: add a message when load_binary fails, add a check for fatal signals
in signal_delivered (avoiding a single check in force_sigsegv as other
architectures use it directly and may have different expectations).

Thanks to Dmitry Safonov and Oleg Nesterov for their comments and
suggestions.

Fixes: 19d860a140be ("handle suicide on late failure exits in execve() in search_binary_handler()")
Reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/14/5
Signed-off-by: Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>
---
 fs/exec.c       | 7 ++++++-
 kernel/signal.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index fb72d36f7823..caf584064f89 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1660,7 +1660,12 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 		if (retval < 0 && !bprm->mm) {
 			/* we got to flush_old_exec() and failed after it */
 			read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
-			force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV, current);
+			if (!fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+				if (print_fatal_signals)
+					pr_info("load_binary() failed: %d\n",
+						retval);
+				force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV, current);
+			}
 			return retval;
 		}
 		if (retval != -ENOEXEC || !bprm->file) {
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index e1d7ad8e6ab1..674076e63624 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2552,10 +2552,10 @@ static void signal_delivered(struct ksignal *ksig, int stepping)
 
 void signal_setup_done(int failed, struct ksignal *ksig, int stepping)
 {
-	if (failed)
-		force_sigsegv(ksig->sig, current);
-	else
+	if (!failed)
 		signal_delivered(ksig, stepping);
+	else if (!fatal_signal_pending(current))
+		force_sigsegv(ksig->sig, current);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.20.1