linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] btrfs: add zstd compression level support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190205160302.GA89375@dennisz-mbp>
Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:03:02 -0500
From:   Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc:     Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
        Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] btrfs: add zstd compression level support

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:57:53PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0500, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > 
> > V2 had only a handful of changes outside of minor feedback.
> > 0001:
> > - use functions over macros
> > 0003:
> > - BTRFS_NR_WORKSPACE_MANAGERS is added instead of overriding
> >   BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES
> > 0011 (new):
> > - address monotonic memory requirement for zstd workspaces
> > 0012:
> > - increase reclaim timer to 307s from 67s
> > - move from keeping track of time in ns to jiffies
> > - remove timer in cleanup code
> > - use min_t() instead of if statements in .set_level()
> > - add header text to describe how workspaces are managed
> > - nofs_flag type -> unsigned long to unsigned int
> 
> Something is wrong, the patchset on top of 5.0-rc5 hangs in test
> btrfs/007, without a stacktrace. V1 was fine and I double checked that
> rc5 itself is fine.

Hmmm, well that's awkward. I ran xfstests and that test passed on my
machine. I'll figure out the delta and submit a v3. Thanks David!

Thanks,
Dennis