linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add TI PRUSS bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:19:45 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Cc:     Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, s-anna@...com, ohad@...ery.com,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, david@...hnology.com, nsekhar@...com,
        t-kristo@...com, nsaulnier@...com, jreeder@...com,
        woods.technical@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add TI PRUSS bindings

* Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com> [190205 16:13]:
> On 02/05/2019 10:41 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > What I'm suggesting here is that kernel remoteproc driver should have nothing to do
> > with the other PRU's data RAM.
> > 
> > The application driver if needs both PRUs then it can obviously access both DRAMs
> > as it has a phandle to both PRUs.
> > 
> That should be fine.

That sounds good to me too.

For dts, yeah please allocate the resources for the modules
where the resources belong to on the PRUSS internal interconnect :)
Devices can move around on the interconnect between SoCs and the
modules can get swapped or added.

Regards,

Tony