[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190205161945.GS5720@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:19:45 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, s-anna@...com, ohad@...ery.com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, david@...hnology.com, nsekhar@...com,
t-kristo@...com, nsaulnier@...com, jreeder@...com,
woods.technical@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add TI PRUSS bindings
* Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com> [190205 16:13]:
> On 02/05/2019 10:41 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > What I'm suggesting here is that kernel remoteproc driver should have nothing to do
> > with the other PRU's data RAM.
> >
> > The application driver if needs both PRUs then it can obviously access both DRAMs
> > as it has a phandle to both PRUs.
> >
> That should be fine.
That sounds good to me too.
For dts, yeah please allocate the resources for the modules
where the resources belong to on the PRUSS internal interconnect :)
Devices can move around on the interconnect between SoCs and the
modules can get swapped or added.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists