linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/35] ARM: davinci: aintc: use irq domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me67M+JPg-mxKpCnuMm6NFkL-OLrJ+5XiKztd=bmm+PKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:29:09 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/35] ARM: davinci: aintc: use irq domain

pon., 4 lut 2019 o 23:42 David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> napisał(a):
>
> On 1/31/19 7:39 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > We need to create an irq domain if we want to select SPARSE_IRQ. The
> > cp-intc driver already supports it, but aintc doesn't. Use the helpers
> > provided by the generic irq chip abstraction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c
> > index e539bc65d4ef..c874ea269411 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >   #include <linux/irq.h>
> >   #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >
> >   #include <mach/hardware.h>
> >   #include <mach/cputype.h>
> > @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
> >   #define IRQ_INTPRI7_REG_OFFSET      0x004C
> >
> >   static void __iomem *davinci_intc_base;
> > +static struct irq_domain *davinci_irq_domain;
> >
> >   static inline void davinci_irq_writel(unsigned long value, int offset)
> >   {
> > @@ -55,17 +57,15 @@ static inline unsigned long davinci_irq_readl(int offset)
> >   }
> >
> >   static __init void
> > -davinci_alloc_gc(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start, unsigned int num)
> > +davinci_irq_setup_gc(void __iomem *base,
> > +                  unsigned int irq_start, unsigned int num)
> >   {
> >       struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> >       struct irq_chip_type *ct;
> >
> > -     gc = irq_alloc_generic_chip("AINTC", 1, irq_start, base, handle_edge_irq);
> > -     if (!gc) {
> > -             pr_err("%s: irq_alloc_generic_chip for IRQ %u failed\n",
> > -                    __func__, irq_start);
> > -             return;
> > -     }
> > +     gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(davinci_irq_domain, irq_start);
>
> check for (gc == NULL) here?
>

I can add it, but it's not really needed. We know we pass correct
parameters to this routine and if it fails, the system won't boot
anyway.

Bart