[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190205140415.544ae2876ee44e6edb8ca743@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:04:15 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keith.busch@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] mm: Shuffle initial free memory to improve
memory-side-cache utilization
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:15:17 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> +config SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR
> + bool "Page allocator randomization"
> + default SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM && ACPI_NUMA
> + help
SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM is default n, so this patchset won't get much
runtime testing.
How about you cook up a (-mm only) patch which makes the kernel default
to SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM=y, SHUFFLE_PAGE_ALLOCATOR=y (or whatever) to
ensure we get a decent amount of runtime testing? Then I can hold that
in -mm (and -next) until we get bored of it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists