[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206095810.GL24598@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:58:10 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Oliver.Rohe@...o.com
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rs5c372: Fix reading from rtc when the oscillator
got interrupted.
On 06/02/2019 06:33:39+0000, Oliver.Rohe@...o.com wrote:
> >> + switch (rs5c->type) {
> >> + case rtc_r2025sd:
> >> + case rtc_r2221tl:
> >> + if (ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_VDET)
> >> + dev_warn(&client->dev, "rtc battery voltage drop below threshold detected.\n");
> >
> > VDET doesn't mean anything specific regarding timekeeping so I wouldn't warn here.
>
> VDET means in case the chip is powered by a battery, that is about to die sometime soon, it gives you heads up.
Yes but my statement stands true, this doesn't have any direct
implication regarding timekeeping.
There is the RTC_VL_READ ioctl to check voltage low. It is not weel
designed but this is what we have now.
> >
> >> + if (ctrl2 & R2x2x_CTRL2_PON)
> >> + dev_warn(&client->dev, "rtc battery voltage drop to zero detected.\n");
> >
> > You should return -EINVAL directly here
>
> The PON implies the XSTP bit, so I only return from there, just to print all the warning messages, but I can return directly from here if you want.
As you said, PON implies XSTP so I'm not sure it is valuable to have both
warnings.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists