linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: core: Return EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOSYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:28:32 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alice Ferrazzi <alicef@...cef.me>, jeyu@...nel.org,
        jikos@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alice Ferrazzi <alice.ferrazzi@...aclelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] livepatch: core: Return EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOSYS

On Tue 2019-02-05 09:59:33, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:33:28AM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> > From: Alice Ferrazzi <alice.ferrazzi@...aclelinux.com>
> > 
> > As a result of an unsupported operation is better to use EOPNOTSUPP
> > as error code.
> > ENOSYS is only used for 'invalid syscall nr' and nothing else.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alice Ferrazzi <alice.ferrazzi@...aclelinux.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>

I have applied the patch into for-5.1/atomic-replace branch.

Best Regards,
Petr