[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206122458.0000793c@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 12:24:58 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 07/10] acpi/hmat: Register performance attributes
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:07:21 -0700
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com> wrote:
> Register the local attached performace access attributes with the memory's
performance
> node if HMAT provides the locality table. While HMAT does make it possible
> to know performance for all possible initiator-target pairings, we export
> only the local and matching pairings at this time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig
> index c9637e2e7514..08e972ead159 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> config ACPI_HMAT
> bool "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table Support"
> depends on ACPI_NUMA
> + select HMEM_REPORTING
> help
> If set, this option causes the kernel to set the memory NUMA node
> relationships and access attributes in accordance with ACPI HMAT
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> index 85fd835c2e23..917e6122b3f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
> @@ -430,6 +430,19 @@ static __init void hmat_register_target_initiators(struct memory_target *target)
> hmat_register_if_local(target, initiator);
> }
>
> +static __init void hmat_register_target_perf(struct memory_target *target)
> +{
> + unsigned mem_nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
> + struct node_hmem_attrs hmem_attrs = {
> + .read_bandwidth = target->read_bandwidth,
> + .write_bandwidth= target->write_bandwidth,
> + .read_latency = target->read_latency,
> + .write_latency = target->write_latency,
> + };
> +
> + node_set_perf_attrs(mem_nid, &hmem_attrs, 0);
> +}
> +
> static __init void hmat_register_targets(void)
> {
> struct memory_target *target, *tnext;
> @@ -439,6 +452,7 @@ static __init void hmat_register_targets(void)
> list_for_each_entry_safe(target, tnext, &targets, node) {
> list_del(&target->node);
> hmat_register_target_initiators(target);
> + hmat_register_target_perf(target);
> kfree(target);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists