[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206114220.5632c187@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:42:20 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
between commit:
fcd70cd36b9b ("drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h")
from the drm tree and commit:
5f5c139d6900 ("drm/i915: Allocate active tracking nodes from a slabcache")
from the drm-intel tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 5d05572c9ff4,36fa6f1905fc..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@@ -26,8 -26,7 +26,9 @@@
#include <linux/vgaarb.h>
#include <linux/vga_switcheroo.h>
+#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
+
+ #include "i915_active.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "i915_selftest.h"
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists