linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V12 3/5] i2c: tegra: Add DMA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:23:21 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mantravadi Karthik <mkarthik@...dia.com>,
        Shardar Mohammed <smohammed@...dia.com>,
        Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>
Cc:     "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 3/5] i2c: tegra: Add DMA support

06.02.2019 16:17, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
> 
> 
>>>> BTW, I'm seeing "atmel_mxt_ts 0-004c: Warning: Info CRC error - device=0xF436DC file=0x000000" whithout making any modifications to the original patch as well and it shall not happen, hence there is bug somewhere. Probably FIFO triggers are still not set up correctly... ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> In snippet you sent, I see you are forcing dma_burst to 1 always which is what set for fifo trigger levels as well and also you are forcing dma all the time.
>>> So always it will be 1 word dma burst and 1 word trigger level and that should not be an issue.
>>>
>>
>> I reverted that snippet, this log is collected with the yours original patch.
>>
> From atmel driver, looks like this warning is from maxt_update_cfg and due to CRC mismatch and above values shows read data CRC is 0Xf436dc which is compared against info_crc of all 0's 
> Info_crc is based on raw config file and somehow its all 0's. this is not based on data read thru i2c. 
> data->info_crc computed on data read is 0Xf436dc
> 
> This warning is not related to I2C transfer
> 

It doesn't happen with the I2C PIO mode. Seems it means that the I2C reads out the 0xF436DC value instead of 0x000000.. if I'm not missing anything.