[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f6ac9c6-bdc8-2a48-8f95-d761d5d56d8d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:35:15 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mantravadi Karthik <mkarthik@...dia.com>,
Shardar Mohammed <smohammed@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 3/5] i2c: tegra: Add DMA support
06.02.2019 17:29, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>
>>>>>> Yes please post full log of PIO only and DMA only Also, in above
>>>>>> log, lots of DMA transfer went thru fine except this one transfer
>>>>>> where DMA timed out.
>>>>>> DMA completion doesnt happen on DMA submit during this particular
>>>>>> transaction timeframe for some reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dmitry, can you provide some background information on the setup
>>>>> that you're using? I vaguely remember something about i2c@...0d000
>>>>> being special on older Tegra devices. Perhaps there's something
>>>>> additional that we need to take into account?
>>>>>
>>>>> Aha! Look at tegra_i2c_reg_addr() which special-cases I2C_TX_FIFO on
>>>>> the DVC variant of the controller, which is exactly the one that you
>>>>> are seeing the timeouts on and it's exactly the register that we use
>>>>> as destination for the DMA transfer.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we need to do something like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> slv_config.dst_addr = i2c_dev->base_phys +
>>>>> tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, I2C_TX_FIFO);
>>>>>
>>>>> to make sure we pass the right FIFO register address to DMA.
>>>>
>>>> I'm running it on T20 at the moment. I don't know about the DVC quirks, but sounds plausible. Please let me know if you need any other info.
>>>>
>>>> Here the full logs:
>>>>
>>>> PIO-only: http://dpaste.com/2MX3EAN.txt
>>>> DMA-only: http://dpaste.com/3VXZSSM.txt
>>>>
>>>> Note the "Failed to read T44 and T5 (-110)" error that happens in DMA-only. And it happens on i2c@...0c000, DVC is i2c@...0d000.
>>>
>>> Yes this is due to same issue theirry mentioned.
>>> Prior to transfer timeout for touch, tps6586x regulator probe failed due to i2c timeout which uses DVC (7000D000) and since DMA mode is enforced all DVC/PWR I2C transactions also go thru DMA and FIFO register for DVC offset is not accounted when configure to dma slave.
>>> Will fix and send so you can see for repro with updated patch..
>>>
>>>
>>> [ 0.925155] tegra-i2c 7000d000.i2c: starting DMA for length: 16
>>> [ 0.925165] tegra-i2c 7000d000.i2c: unmasked irq: 0c
>>> [ 1.028961] tegra-i2c 7000d000.i2c: i2c transfer timed out
>>> [ 1.028968] tegra-i2c 7000c000.i2c: DMA transfer timeout
>>> [ 1.028995] tps6586x 3-0034: Chip ID read failed: -110
>>> [ 1.029029] tps6586x: probe of 3-0034 failed with error -5
>>> [ 1.029045] atmel_mxt_ts 0-004c: __mxt_read_reg: i2c transfer failed (-110)
>>> [ 1.029051] atmel_mxt_ts 0-004c: Failed to read T44 and T5 (-110)
>>>
>>
>> I think tps6586x and atmel-touch should be independent issues, but will see. Thanks!
> Whats your platform setup? Is atmel touch power ON default or its programmed during boot by SW whcih need to use DVC?
>
It's "power ON default". I tried to boot in PIO-only mode with tps6586x disabled and there is no "Failed to read T44 and T5" error, atmel probed successfully.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists