[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1549469662-13614-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:14:21 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org
Cc: tj@...nel.org, sargun@...gun.me, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
xiezhipeng1@...wei.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: optimization of update_blocked_averages()
Removing a cfs_rq from rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list can break the parent/child
ordering of the list when it will be added back. In order to remove an
empty and fully decayed cfs_rq, we must remove its children too so they
will be added back in the right order next time.
With a normal decay of pelt, a parent will be empty and fully decayed
if all children are empty and fully decayed too. In such a case, we just
have to ensure that the whole branch will be added when a new task is
enqueued. This is default behavior since :
commit f6783319737f ("sched/fair: Fix insertion in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list")
In case of throttling, the pelt of throttled cfs_rq will not be updated
whereas the parent will. This breaks the assumption made above unless we
remove the children of a cfs_rq that is throttled. Then, they will be
added back when unthrottled and a sched_entity will be enqueued.
As throttled cfs_rq are now removed from the list, we can remove the
associated test in update_blocked_averages().
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ffd1ae7..badf8173 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -346,6 +346,18 @@ static inline bool list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (cfs_rq->on_list) {
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+
+ /*
+ * With cfs_rq being unthrottled/throttled during an enqueue,
+ * it can happen the tmp_alone_branch points the a leaf that
+ * we finally want to del. In this case, tmp_alone_branch moves
+ * to the prev element but it will point to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list
+ * at the end of the enqueue.
+ */
+ if (rq->tmp_alone_branch == &cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch = cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.prev;
+
list_del_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
cfs_rq->on_list = 0;
}
@@ -4438,6 +4450,10 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
/* adjust cfs_rq_clock_task() */
cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
+
+ /* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1)
+ list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
return 0;
@@ -4449,8 +4465,10 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq)];
/* group is entering throttled state, stop time */
- if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count)
+ if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_task(rq);
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ }
cfs_rq->throttle_count++;
return 0;
@@ -7699,10 +7717,6 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
struct sched_entity *se;
- /* throttled entities do not contribute to load */
- if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
- continue;
-
if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq))
update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists