[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206164657.GC8466@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:46:57 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/3] Address potential user-after-free on module unload
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:12:31PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 1:43 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It really should happen when the device is removed (if it is a driver
> > that binds to a device.)
>
> Absolutely. That's why I'm advocating adding a devm_init_work(),
> which will take care of this automatically.
>
> But it's of course not universally applicable. Not all drivers use devm.
Ick, no, watch out for devm() calls. Odds are this is _NOT_ what you
want to do for a device. Remember when devm calls get freed (hint, not
at driver unbind/unload, but at device structure removal.
By creating a work queue, you are suddenly tying module code to a device
memory structure lifespan, both of which are totally independant.
It's the same issue with the devm irq call, that has been nothing but a
nightmare as everyone gets it wrong. Try to learn from our past
mistakes please :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists