[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190206165828.66A711127EA3@debutante.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:58:28 +0000 (GMT)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Only support passing enable GPIO descriptors" to the regulator tree
The patch
regulator: core: Only support passing enable GPIO descriptors
has been applied to the regulator tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 541d052d721506549774ab780a2709e4ff8ca79b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:31:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Only support passing enable GPIO descriptors
Now that we changed all providers to pass descriptors into the core
for enable GPIOs instead of a global GPIO number, delete the support
for passing GPIO numbers in, and we get a cleanup and size reduction
in the core, and from a GPIO point of view we use the modern, cleaner
interface.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 32 ++++++--------------------------
include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 12 +-----------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 1778c5d1b2d0..4fb475a2e4f2 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -2236,35 +2235,19 @@ static int regulator_ena_gpio_request(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
{
struct regulator_enable_gpio *pin;
struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
- int ret;
- if (config->ena_gpiod)
- gpiod = config->ena_gpiod;
- else
- gpiod = gpio_to_desc(config->ena_gpio);
+ gpiod = config->ena_gpiod;
list_for_each_entry(pin, ®ulator_ena_gpio_list, list) {
if (pin->gpiod == gpiod) {
- rdev_dbg(rdev, "GPIO %d is already used\n",
- config->ena_gpio);
+ rdev_dbg(rdev, "GPIO is already used\n");
goto update_ena_gpio_to_rdev;
}
}
- if (!config->ena_gpiod) {
- ret = gpio_request_one(config->ena_gpio,
- GPIOF_DIR_OUT | config->ena_gpio_flags,
- rdev_get_name(rdev));
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
-
pin = kzalloc(sizeof(struct regulator_enable_gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (pin == NULL) {
- if (!config->ena_gpiod)
- gpio_free(config->ena_gpio);
+ if (pin == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
pin->gpiod = gpiod;
list_add(&pin->list, ®ulator_ena_gpio_list);
@@ -2287,7 +2270,6 @@ static void regulator_ena_gpio_free(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (pin->gpiod == rdev->ena_pin->gpiod) {
if (pin->request_count <= 1) {
pin->request_count = 0;
- gpiod_put(pin->gpiod);
list_del(&pin->list);
kfree(pin);
rdev->ena_pin = NULL;
@@ -4971,15 +4953,13 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
goto clean;
}
- if (config->ena_gpiod ||
- ((config->ena_gpio || config->ena_gpio_initialized) &&
- gpio_is_valid(config->ena_gpio))) {
+ if (config->ena_gpiod) {
mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex);
if (ret != 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO%d: %d\n",
- config->ena_gpio, ret);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %d\n",
+ ret);
goto clean;
}
/* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
index 795b38a06b6c..7f8345bff4e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
@@ -401,13 +401,7 @@ struct regulator_desc {
* NULL).
* @regmap: regmap to use for core regmap helpers if dev_get_regmap() is
* insufficient.
- * @ena_gpio_initialized: GPIO controlling regulator enable was properly
- * initialized, meaning that >= 0 is a valid gpio
- * identifier and < 0 is a non existent gpio.
- * @ena_gpio: GPIO controlling regulator enable.
- * @ena_gpiod: GPIO descriptor controlling regulator enable.
- * @ena_gpio_invert: Sense for GPIO enable control.
- * @ena_gpio_flags: Flags to use when calling gpio_request_one()
+ * @ena_gpiod: GPIO controlling regulator enable.
*/
struct regulator_config {
struct device *dev;
@@ -416,11 +410,7 @@ struct regulator_config {
struct device_node *of_node;
struct regmap *regmap;
- bool ena_gpio_initialized;
- int ena_gpio;
struct gpio_desc *ena_gpiod;
- unsigned int ena_gpio_invert:1;
- unsigned int ena_gpio_flags;
};
/*
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists