[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206190726.GI7314@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 20:07:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree
steps
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:58:58PM +0100, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> text_poke_bp() updates instructions on live kernel on SMP in three steps:
> 1) add a int3 trap to the address that will be patched
> 2) update all but the first byte of the patched range
> 3) replace the first byte (int3) by the first byte of
>
> This patch creates one function for each of these steps.
s/This patch creates/Create/
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists