[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190206212218.GJ7314@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:22:18 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 (drivers/edac/skx* and i10nm)
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> CONFIG_EDAC_I10NM=y
> but CONFIG_EDAC_SKX is not set.
> since # CONFIG_ACPI is not set
>
> Should EDAC_I10NM depend on ACPI also?
This should do it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d6a9f7336d925364daca00557afa59a68e78b422
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists