lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D6E44AB3-39AB-41C2-83E3-0ABC910B66BE@vmware.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:17:46 +0000
From:   Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Julien Freche <jfreche@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] vmw_balloon: bump version number

> On Feb 6, 2019, at 1:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 08:39:52PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 8:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:13:31PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>> Following recent changes.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c b/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
>>>> index f8240b87df22..7294f305753f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
>>>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>>>> 
>>>> MODULE_AUTHOR("VMware, Inc.");
>>>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("VMware Memory Control (Balloon) Driver");
>>>> -MODULE_VERSION("1.5.0.0-k");
>>>> +MODULE_VERSION("1.6.0.0-k");
>>> 
>>> Please just drop this pointless line, it means nothing and is always out
>>> of date.  It's been removed from many other drivers, and I really don't
>>> want to see it come back.
>>> 
>>> Your driver "version" is the kernel version, full stop.  That's all you
>>> need to ever worry about.
>> 
>> I understand, and I will inform those who asked for the version bump.
>> 
>> Having said that, I do not see a reference for this policy. I understand
>> that you removed the MODULE_VERSION from in-kernel drivers, but I also see
>> that you accepted several drivers last year that used MODULE_VERSION.
> 
> I messed up, and will be glad to take patches to remove them.  Usually
> that's the last thing I remember to check when reviewing patches, I
> can always use the help :)
> 
> Also, I only received 1 patch in this series, did something go wrong
> with the sending of it?

Err. Thanks for letting me know. I guess that that I messed up the git-send
trying to avoid cc’ing patch author who got his email address deactivated.

I will resend.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ