[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190207111606.6b72dc34@xps13>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:16:06 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: call onfi_fill_data_interface() once
again after nand_detect
Hi Masahiro,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote on Thu, 7 Feb
2019 18:57:56 +0900:
> nand_scan_ident() calls onfi_fill_data_interface() at its entry
> to set up the initial timing parameters.
>
> The timing parameters are needed not only for ->setup_data_interface(),
> but also for giving the correct delay to NAND_OP_WAIT_RDY, for example.
>
> If the driver sets the NAND_KEEP_TIMINGS flag, or does not support
> ->setup_data_interface() hook, those parameters will never updated.
^ be
>
> Before nand_detect(), we never know whether the chip is ONFi or not.
> So, onfi_fill_data_interface() has to assume the worst case, i.e.
> non-ONFi.
s/ONFi/ONFI/?
>
> After nand_detect(), if the chip turns out to be ONFi-compliant,
> we can optimize tPROG_max, tBERS_max, etc.
>
> Call onfi_fill_data_interface() once again.
Sorry but I don't get why this is needed as there is the same call at
the top of this function. Can you be more specific on where/when the
missing call produces a failure?
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 9b3d7ff..35e543c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -5040,6 +5040,9 @@ static int nand_scan_ident(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int maxchips,
>
> nand_deselect_target(chip);
>
> + /* If the chip turns out ONFi, we can optimize timing parameters. */
> + onfi_fill_data_interface(chip, NAND_SDR_IFACE, 0);
> +
> /* Check for a chip array */
> for (i = 1; i < maxchips; i++) {
> u8 id[2];
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists