linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 22/34] ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190207113026.434645173@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  7 Feb 2019 12:42:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 22/34] ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>

commit 7969e5c40dfd04799d4341f1b7cd266b6e47f227 upstream.

This behavior is required in IPv6, and there is little need
to tolerate overlapping fragments in IPv4. This change
simplifies the code and eliminates potential DDoS attack vectors.

Tested: ran ip_defrag selftest (not yet available uptream).

Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.4:
 - s/__IP_INC_STATS/IP_INC_STATS_BH/
 - Deleted code is slightly different]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/uapi/linux/snmp.h |    1 
 net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c    |   72 ++++++++++++----------------------------------
 net/ipv4/proc.c           |    1 
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

--- a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum
 	IPSTATS_MIB_ECT1PKTS,			/* InECT1Pkts */
 	IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS,			/* InECT0Pkts */
 	IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS,			/* InCEPkts */
+	IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS,		/* ReasmOverlaps */
 	__IPSTATS_MIB_MAX
 };
 
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ static int ip_frag_reinit(struct ipq *qp
 /* Add new segment to existing queue. */
 static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	struct net *net = container_of(qp->q.net, struct net, ipv4.frags);
 	struct sk_buff *prev, *next;
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	unsigned int fragsize;
@@ -357,60 +358,23 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp,
 	}
 
 found:
-	/* We found where to put this one.  Check for overlap with
-	 * preceding fragment, and, if needed, align things so that
-	 * any overlaps are eliminated.
+	/* RFC5722, Section 4, amended by Errata ID : 3089
+	 *                          When reassembling an IPv6 datagram, if
+	 *   one or more its constituent fragments is determined to be an
+	 *   overlapping fragment, the entire datagram (and any constituent
+	 *   fragments) MUST be silently discarded.
+	 *
+	 * We do the same here for IPv4.
 	 */
-	if (prev) {
-		int i = (prev->ip_defrag_offset + prev->len) - offset;
 
-		if (i > 0) {
-			offset += i;
-			err = -EINVAL;
-			if (end <= offset)
-				goto err;
-			err = -ENOMEM;
-			if (!pskb_pull(skb, i))
-				goto err;
-			if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
-				skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
-		}
-	}
-
-	err = -ENOMEM;
-
-	while (next && next->ip_defrag_offset < end) {
-		int i = end - next->ip_defrag_offset; /* overlap is 'i' bytes */
-
-		if (i < next->len) {
-			/* Eat head of the next overlapped fragment
-			 * and leave the loop. The next ones cannot overlap.
-			 */
-			if (!pskb_pull(next, i))
-				goto err;
-			next->ip_defrag_offset += i;
-			qp->q.meat -= i;
-			if (next->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
-				next->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
-			break;
-		} else {
-			struct sk_buff *free_it = next;
-
-			/* Old fragment is completely overridden with
-			 * new one drop it.
-			 */
-			next = next->next;
-
-			if (prev)
-				prev->next = next;
-			else
-				qp->q.fragments = next;
-
-			qp->q.meat -= free_it->len;
-			sub_frag_mem_limit(qp->q.net, free_it->truesize);
-			kfree_skb(free_it);
-		}
-	}
+	/* Is there an overlap with the previous fragment? */
+	if (prev &&
+	    (prev->ip_defrag_offset + prev->len) > offset)
+		goto discard_qp;
+
+	/* Is there an overlap with the next fragment? */
+	if (next && next->ip_defrag_offset < end)
+		goto discard_qp;
 
 	/* Note : skb->ip_defrag_offset and skb->dev share the same location */
 	dev = skb->dev;
@@ -458,6 +422,10 @@ found:
 	skb_dst_drop(skb);
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 
+discard_qp:
+	inet_frag_kill(&qp->q);
+	err = -EINVAL;
+	IP_INC_STATS_BH(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS);
 err:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	return err;
--- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_ipext
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InECT1Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT1PKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InECT0Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InCEPkts", IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS),
+	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("ReasmOverlaps", IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS),
 	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };