[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190207123426.9202-3-zev@bewilderbeest.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:34:25 -0600
From: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, yzaikin@...gle.com,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] kernel/sysctl.c: add missing range check in do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv
This bug has apparently existed since the introduction of this function
in the pre-git era (4500e91754d3 in Thomas Gleixner's history.git,
"[NET]: Add proc_dointvec_userhz_jiffies, use it for proper handling of
neighbour sysctls."). As a minimal fix we can simply duplicate the
corresponding check in do_proc_dointvec_conv().
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v2.6.2+
Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
---
kernel/sysctl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 5fc724e4e454..a71c4b3935bc 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2564,7 +2564,16 @@ static int do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv(bool *negp, unsigned long *lvalp,
{
struct do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param *param = data;
if (write) {
- int val = *negp ? -*lvalp : *lvalp;
+ int val;
+ if (*negp) {
+ if (*lvalp > (unsigned long) INT_MAX + 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ val = -*lvalp;
+ } else {
+ if (*lvalp > (unsigned long) INT_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ val = *lvalp;
+ }
if ((param->min && *param->min > val) ||
(param->max && *param->max < val))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists