linux-kernel - Re: bcache on XFS: metadata I/O (dirent I/O?) not getting cached at all?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <438851ef-ef77-b5f2-d46d-05762b6330b2@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:38:58 +0800
From:   Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Andre Noll <maan@...bingen.mpg.de>
Cc:     Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: bcache on XFS: metadata I/O (dirent I/O?) not getting cached at
 all?

On 2019/2/7 10:26 上午, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 01:24:25AM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 10:43, Dave Chinner wrote
>>> File data readahead: REQ_RAHEAD
>>> Metadata readahead: REQ_META | REQ_RAHEAD
>>>
>>> drivers/md/bcache/request.c::check_should_bypass():
>>>
>>>         /*
>>>          * Flag for bypass if the IO is for read-ahead or background,
>>>          * unless the read-ahead request is for metadata (eg, for gfs2).
>>>          */
>>>         if (bio->bi_opf & (REQ_RAHEAD|REQ_BACKGROUND) &&
>>>             !(bio->bi_opf & REQ_PRIO))
>>>                 goto skip;
>>>
>>> bcache needs fixing - it thinks REQ_PRIO means metadata IO. That's
>>> wrong - REQ_META means it's metadata IO, and so this is a bcache
>>> bug.
>>
>> Do you think 752f66a75abad is bad (ha!) and should be reverted?
> 
> Yes, that change is just broken. From include/linux/blk_types.h:
> 
> 	__REQ_META,             /* metadata io request */
> 	__REQ_PRIO,             /* boost priority in cfq */
> 
> 

Hi Dave,

> i.e. REQ_META means that it is a metadata request, REQ_PRIO means it
> is a "high priority" request. Two completely different things, often
> combined, but not interchangeable.

I found in file system metadata IO, most of time REQ_META and REQ_PRIO
are tagged together for bio, but XFS seems not use REQ_PRIO.

Is there any basic principle for when should these tags to be used or
not ? e.g. If REQ_META is enough for meta data I/O, why REQ_PRIO is used
too. And if REQ_PRIO is necessary, why it is not used in fs/xfs/ code ?

> 
> So, yeah, that needs to be reverted if you want bcache to function
> properly for metadata caching.

Sure, I will fix this, once I make it clear to me.

Thanks for the hint.

-- 

Coly Li