linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: add probe_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 05:53:55 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: add probe_user_read()

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:59:27PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>  v3: Moved 'Returns:" comment after description.
>      Explained in the commit log why the function is defined static inline
> 
>  v2: Added "Returns:" comment and removed probe_user_address()

The correct spelling is 'Return:', not 'Returns:':

Return values
~~~~~~~~~~~~

The return value, if any, should be described in a dedicated section
named ``Return``.