linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/34] 4.4.174-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:41:01 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/34] 4.4.174-stable review

On 2/7/19 6:20 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/7/19 3:41 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.174 release.
>> There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat Feb  9 11:30:10 UTC 2019.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
> 
> Build results:
>      total: 171 pass: 170 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
>      x86_64:allyesconfig
> Qemu test results:
>      total: 291 pass: 291 fail: 0
> 
> The build failure is interesting.
> 
> Relocation offset doesn't fit in 32 bits
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs] Error 1
> make[3]: *** Deleting file 'arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.relocs'
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [bzImage] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> 
> Unfortunately it doesn't tell me _which_ relocation doesn't fit.
> 
> I may have to revert to an older compiler. Wouldn't be the first time.
> Let me try...
> 

Confirmed. This builds fine with gcc-6.5.0 and binutils 2.26.1. Sigh :-(.

Guenter