[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190207150537.GA180446@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:05:37 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Hugo Lefeuvre <hle@....eu.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg Hartman <ghartman@...gle.com>,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/wait: use freezable_schedule when possible
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 12:30:50AM +0100, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> > I'm curious did you try the freezing process and see if pointless wakeups are
> > reduced? That would be an added bonus if you did.
>
> I'm currently testing these changes. I hope to be able to come back with
> more concrete results soon.
>
> Also, I just noticed that the third patch removes a necessary #include
> <linux/freezer.h>. I will submit an updated version tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for the review!
Sure, add these test results to the patch as well showing reduced wakeups.
I would say submit the freezable_schedule as a single separate patch
independent of the vsoc series since it can go in separately, and also
benefits other things than vsoc.
Also CC Rafael (power maintainer) on it.
Thank you!
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists