lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01000168c8e2de6b-9ab820ed-38ad-469c-b210-60fcff8ea81c-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:55:37 +0000
From:   Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Discuss least bad options for resolving longterm-GUP
 usage by RDMA

One approach that may be a clean way to solve this:

1. Long term GUP usage requires the virtual mapping to the pages be fixed
   for the duration of the GUP Map. There never has been a way to break
   the pinnning and thus this needs to be preserved.

2. Page Cache Long term pins are not allowed since regular filesystems
   depend on COW and other tricks which are incompatible with a long term
   pin.

3. Filesystems that allow bypass of the page cache (like XFS / DAX) will
   provide the virtual mapping when the PIN is done and DO NO OPERATIONS
   on the longterm pinned range until the long term pin is removed.
   Hardware may do its job (like for persistent memory) but no data
   consistency on the NVDIMM medium is guaranteed until the long term pin
   is removed  and the filesystems regains control over the area.

4. Long term pin means that the mapped sections are an actively used part
   of the file (like a filesystem write) and it cannot be truncated for
   the duration of the pin. It can be thought of as if the truncate is
   immediate followed by a write extending the file again. The mapping
   by RDMA implies after all that remote writes can occur at anytime
   within the area pinned long term.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ