[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190207173131.GF5720@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 09:31:31 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
bcousson@...libre.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: dts: gta04: add gps support
* Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> [190204 08:30]:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 08:06:30PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:04:16 +0100
> > Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > > The GTA04 has a w2sg0004 or w2sg0084 gps chip. Not detectable
> > > > which one is mounted so use the compatibility entry for w2sg0004
> > > > for all which will work for both.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > - converted to a patchset
> > > > - added vcc-supply
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - some s/gps/gnss/
> > > > - not added vcc-supply because the regulator is not modelled
> > > > in dts at all
> > > >
> > > > w2sg0004 bindings are in next-20190129
> > > >
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > > > index 02d8274a2f47..4ea0f7dc37c6 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > > > @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@
> > > > >;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > + gps_pins: pinmux_gps_pins {
> > >
> > > s/gps/gnss/ would be more consistent, but whatever.
> > >
> > well, gps is already in the file at another place. So it is a bit
> > inconsistent in any case, without further cleanup. If someone comes
> > up with a strong opinion here I would of course change it.
>
> Up to you. As long as the gnss node is named "gnss" I don't have a
> strong opinion on the other names (as long as they follow the spec of
> course).
OK so I'm applying these two patches into omap-for-v5.1/dt.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists