lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 7 Feb 2019 20:11:10 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] driver core: Avoid careless re-use of existing
 device links

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:03 PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
>
> Sorry, late to the party.
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:46:54AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > After commit ead18c23c263 ("driver core: Introduce device links
> > reference counting"), if there is a link between the given supplier
> > and the given consumer already, device_link_add() will refcount it
> > and return it unconditionally.  However, if the flags passed to
> > it on the second (or any subsequent) attempt to create a device
> > link between the same consumer-supplier pair are not compatible with
> > the existing link's flags, that is incorrect.
>
> Prior to ead18c23c263, a second invocation of device_link_add() also
> returned the existing device link without checking for incompatible
> flags.  Hence this issue was not introduced by ead18c23c263, but
> rather by 9ed9895370ae ("driver core: Functional dependencies tracking
> support"), i.e. it was present all along.  (Unless I'm missing something.)
>
>
> > Moreover, if the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER flag is passed to
> > device_link_add(), its caller will expect its reference to the link
> > to be dropped automatically on consumer driver removal, which will
> > not happen if that flag is not set in the link's flags (and
> > analogously for DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER).  For this reason, make
> > device_link_add() update the existing link's flags accordingly
> > before returning it to the caller.
>
> Same here.
>
>
> > Fixes: ead18c23c263 ("driver core: Introduce device links reference counting")
>
> Should rather be
> Fixes: 9ed9895370ae ("driver core: Functional dependencies tracking support")
>
> (Again, unless I'm missing something.)

I haven't checked far enough into the past, sorry about that.

You are right, but actually I think that

Fixes: 9ed9895370ae ("driver core: Functional dependencies tracking support")

should be there in addition to the other Fixes: tag, because the issue
is still present after that commit and the patch does not apply
directly on top of 9ed9895370ae.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists