[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <602509505.322713.1549656339538@email.ionos.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 21:05:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: mlangsdo@...hat.com, suzuki.poulose@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, julien.thierry@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
steven.price@....com, ykaukab@...e.de, dave.martin@....com,
shankerd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] arm64: add system vulnerability sysfs entries
> Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com> hat am 25. Januar 2019 um 19:06 geschrieben:
>
>
> Arm64 machines should be displaying a human readable
> vulnerability status to speculative execution attacks in
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities
>
> This series enables that behavior by providing the expected
> functions. Those functions expose the cpu errata and feature
> states, as well as whether firmware is responding appropriately
> to display the overall machine status. This means that in a
> heterogeneous machine we will only claim the machine is mitigated
> or safe if we are confident all booted cores are safe or
> mitigated.
>
The whole series is:
Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
with a Raspberry Pi 3 B+
Powered by blists - more mailing lists