[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190208203834.GA24693@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:38:34 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviourä
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:23:53PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:27:31PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 2/8/19 2:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > */
> > > if (rc > 0) {
> > > dev_warn(&chip->dev,
> > > "%s: send(): invalid value %d\n", __func__, rc);
> > > rc = 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Should be fairly safe play now.
> >
> > Unfortuantely it isn't. You seemed to have lost the
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_start/stop) and the tpm_chip_start/stop around
> > the tpm2_shutdown()...
>
> OK, now those fixes are back. In tpm_pm_shutdown() case you need also
> take the lock.
I back tracked now what went wrong. When I first did these fixes I did
git reset --hard next on master after doing them and not the other way
around I supposed to. Apologies for the inconvenience...
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists