linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190208205453.GA3232@embeddedor>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:54:53 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a
 missing break

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c:85:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:940:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:943:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:972:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:974:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3391:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
security/apparmor/domain.c:569:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

Also, add a missing break statement to fix the following warning:

security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:116:26: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Update Subject.
 - Integrate a missing break in switch fix by Mimi Zohar.

 security/apparmor/domain.c                | 2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c     | 1 +
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c       | 4 ++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 1 +
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c                | 3 +--
 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 3b266a438776..ca2dccf5b445 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static struct aa_label *x_to_label(struct aa_profile *profile,
 			stack = NULL;
 			break;
 		}
-		/* fall through to X_NAME */
+		/* fall through - to X_NAME */
 	case AA_X_NAME:
 		if (xindex & AA_X_CHILD)
 			/* released by caller */
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index a2baa85ea2f5..5fb7127bbe68 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void ima_set_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 		break;
 	case CREDS_CHECK:
 		iint->ima_creds_status = status;
+		break;
 	case FILE_CHECK:
 	case POST_SETATTR:
 		iint->ima_file_status = status;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 26fa9d9723f6..e0cc323f948f 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -936,10 +936,12 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 		case Opt_uid_gt:
 		case Opt_euid_gt:
 			entry->uid_op = &uid_gt;
+			/* fall through */
 		case Opt_uid_lt:
 		case Opt_euid_lt:
 			if ((token == Opt_uid_lt) || (token == Opt_euid_lt))
 				entry->uid_op = &uid_lt;
+			/* fall through */
 		case Opt_uid_eq:
 		case Opt_euid_eq:
 			uid_token = (token == Opt_uid_eq) ||
@@ -968,9 +970,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 			break;
 		case Opt_fowner_gt:
 			entry->fowner_op = &uid_gt;
+			/* fall through */
 		case Opt_fowner_lt:
 			if (token == Opt_fowner_lt)
 				entry->fowner_op = &uid_lt;
+			/* fall through */
 		case Opt_fowner_eq:
 			ima_log_string_op(ab, "fowner", args[0].from,
 					  entry->fowner_op);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
index 43752002c222..513b457ae900 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static void ima_show_template_data_ascii(struct seq_file *m,
 		/* skip ':' and '\0' */
 		buf_ptr += 2;
 		buflen -= buf_ptr - field_data->data;
+		/* fall through */
 	case DATA_FMT_DIGEST:
 	case DATA_FMT_HEX:
 		if (!buflen)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 587dc06eba33..5c1613519d5a 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -3380,13 +3380,12 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
 		 */
 		final = &smack_known_star;
 		/*
-		 * Fall through.
-		 *
 		 * If a smack value has been set we want to use it,
 		 * but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity
 		 * to set mount options simulate setting the
 		 * superblock default.
 		 */
+		/* Fall through */
 	default:
 		/*
 		 * This isn't an understood special case.
-- 
2.20.1