linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <d34dd6ec-248e-b7f8-edb0-367f1f4f9356@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:06:33 -0500
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Safford, David (GE Global Research)" <david.safford@...com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3

On 2/8/19 5:00 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:21:02PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> I still think that in 5/5 branching could be better but is not a biggie
> for me (does not make the implementation as whole any kind of mess) and
> since it is now peer tested I rather would not modify it right now.
>
> Applied to master and next!


5/5 may cause a complaint about the scanf'ing of a single value in an 
existing line. Let's see...

    Thanks.

       Stefan