lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 22:59:20 +0000
From:   "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz" <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sbauer@...donthack.me" <sbauer@...donthack.me>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:     "jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de" 
        <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] block: sed-opal: rename next to execute_steps

Looks good

Reviewed-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>

On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 21:50 +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> As the function is responsible for executing the individual steps supplied
> in the steps argument, execute_steps is a more descriptive name than the
> rather generic next.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@...donthack.me>
> ---
>  block/sed-opal.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
> index 3362741dd198..c09149dd5e0a 100644
> --- a/block/sed-opal.c
> +++ b/block/sed-opal.c
> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static int execute_step(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> -static int next(struct opal_dev *dev, const struct opal_step *steps,
> -		size_t n_steps)
> +static int execute_steps(struct opal_dev *dev,
> +			 const struct opal_step *steps, size_t n_steps)
>  {
>  	size_t state;
>  	int error;
> @@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ static int opal_secure_erase_locking_range(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, erase_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(erase_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, erase_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(erase_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2051,7 +2051,7 @@ static int opal_erase_locking_range(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, erase_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(erase_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, erase_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(erase_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ static int opal_enable_disable_shadow_mbr(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, mbr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(mbr_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, mbr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(mbr_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ static int opal_mbr_status(struct opal_dev *dev, struct opal_mbr_data *opal_mbr)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, mbr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(mbr_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, mbr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(mbr_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@ static int opal_write_shadow_mbr(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, mbr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(mbr_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, mbr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(mbr_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2174,7 +2174,7 @@ static int opal_add_user_to_lr(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, steps, ARRAY_SIZE(steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, steps, ARRAY_SIZE(steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2189,7 +2189,7 @@ static int opal_reverttper(struct opal_dev *dev, struct opal_key *opal)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, revert_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(revert_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, revert_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(revert_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2217,10 +2217,11 @@ static int __opal_lock_unlock(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  	};
>  
>  	if (lk_unlk->session.sum)
> -		return next(dev, unlock_sum_steps,
> -			    ARRAY_SIZE(unlock_sum_steps));
> +		return execute_steps(dev, unlock_sum_steps,
> +				     ARRAY_SIZE(unlock_sum_steps));
>  	else
> -		return next(dev, unlock_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(unlock_steps));
> +		return execute_steps(dev, unlock_steps,
> +				     ARRAY_SIZE(unlock_steps));
>  }
>  
>  static int __opal_set_mbr_done(struct opal_dev *dev, struct opal_key *key)
> @@ -2232,7 +2233,7 @@ static int __opal_set_mbr_done(struct opal_dev *dev, struct opal_key *key)
>  		{ end_opal_session, }
>  	};
>  
> -	return next(dev, mbrdone_step, ARRAY_SIZE(mbrdone_step));
> +	return execute_steps(dev, mbrdone_step, ARRAY_SIZE(mbrdone_step));
>  }
>  
>  static int opal_lock_unlock(struct opal_dev *dev,
> @@ -2267,7 +2268,7 @@ static int opal_take_ownership(struct opal_dev *dev, struct opal_key *opal)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, owner_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(owner_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, owner_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(owner_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2288,7 +2289,7 @@ static int opal_activate_lsp(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, active_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(active_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, active_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(active_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2305,7 +2306,7 @@ static int opal_setup_locking_range(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, lr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(lr_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, lr_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(lr_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2327,7 +2328,7 @@ static int opal_set_new_pw(struct opal_dev *dev, struct opal_new_pw *opal_pw)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, pw_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(pw_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, pw_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(pw_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2351,7 +2352,7 @@ static int opal_activate_user(struct opal_dev *dev,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	setup_opal_dev(dev);
> -	ret = next(dev, act_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(act_steps));
> +	ret = execute_steps(dev, act_steps, ARRAY_SIZE(act_steps));
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3278 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ